I'm not sure how that relates? I'm talking abt an assumption coming from feminism that men are the perfectly realised human being
-
-
Replying to @HPluckrose @fronxer
And that women will be equal when they start liking the same things men do in the same numbers.
1 reply 4 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @fronxer
This is most often seen when STEM is presented as better than female dominated realms like education & healthcare.
2 replies 4 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
It is better in terms of pay, which has direct impact on people's quality of life. And it is a job market with high demand and low supply.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @fronxer
It has to be to attract ppl. Women less likely to choose raw income over job satisfaction, flexible hours, convenience etc
1 reply 1 retweet 2 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
My job "in tech" has all those qualities. And I know it's not an exception. Sounds like your starting point is "what if everything is fine"?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @fronxer
Good for you. My starting point is that women don't have to make the same choices as men.
2 replies 1 retweet 8 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
Well yes, sure, if something is a matter of choice, it means that people can make different choices, obvs.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @fronxer
This is the attitude that annoys me. It makes men the default humans whilst supposingly challenging that view.pic.twitter.com/RyxBccMxDW
1 reply 13 retweets 27 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
I challenge the view that choice is free and not externally constrained, including ways of hiding options.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
I've just had a long thread on that.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.