What will you do if you can't respect the right to views w/out respecting views themselves? Seek to ban Republicans or respect their views?https://twitter.com/cblk08/status/881543518384046080 …
'I'm not distinguishing between the respecting the rights to views and respecting views' 'There can be no thought crime police.'
-
-
is not science-savvy enuf, broadly informed enough-- 2 differentiate between the intuitive and technical gaps. It hurt science! U disagree?!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
that got equal, i.e. "balanced" radio and media exposure. It was ludicrous-- a point-of-view-- fine but psychologically the public 4.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
and "irrational" means without merit. And who's to say that? Science. Not God. Again my example is climate-denial, a ridiculous stand 3.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Ergo, I say that an individual is of course free to express it. I also say, paradoxically, I'll act to SUPPRESS IT IF IT IS IRRATIONAL 2.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
A little confusing but here: respect for another's view *is not* the same as the right to it AND making the distinction is philosophical 1.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
& what does my POV have to do with Republicans? I'll act to stop irrationals!