Of course it can be misused. I've been accused of generalising humans when I've said 'people get confused abt X' but I think this different.
-
-
-
It shld be clear that this is some ppl. But picking a group & saying they do or are something makes a problem specific to them.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
There are many issues in this current madness. Another one is, slightly related, that people expect you to spell out every single detail.
-
This is very true but I think we do need to be cautious when saying 'identity group does X bad thing' unless it's literally true.
-
Muslims believe in one God & its prophet.
Muslims oppose LGBT rights.
Muslims are more likely to oppose LGBT rights than non-religious 
-
I think USA thinkers need 2 get off Muslims big-time. Their radical sects are no better than ours. Yea they kill gays, RADICALS KILL PEOPLE
-
I think we should think statistically. 42 % of US Muslims support same sex marriage.
-
More than US evangelicals, less than other US Xtians, way less than non-religious Americans.
-
Love statistics; for audience communication I'd say that to folks with numbers affinity yes. Folks who 'learn' other ways, "nearly half".
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I'm too optimistic. I assume that people mean
#NotAll when they make generalizations. I have to adjust myself to this madness. -
Does it never seem a generalisation? I'd question the bias of someone who said 'women can't drive.'
-
Of course. Tbh I'm often biased against women, because I'm guilty of projection and dislike myself. I am working through that.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
The biggest reaction against
#NotAll is always "but that's obvious" and then they carry on as though it wasn't.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.