No, we're not. We learn more every year. When we don't know things, we can say straightforwardly that we don't know.https://twitter.com/willbradley/status/880996438364135427 …
-
-
Replying to @HPluckrose
Can also accept that all knowledge is provisional. Getting postmodern about it never makes things better.
@willbradley2 replies 3 retweets 16 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
Dismissing feminism and intersectionality (I.e. listening to people different from you) is a bridge too far too, though.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @indyholland @HPluckrose
I mean I'm a straight white cisgendered American male in tech. I get it. I also know that people like me talk OVER others too much.
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Then don't. Accept intellectual diversity & welcome a range of opinions, not just interesectional ones.
1 reply 1 retweet 5 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @indyholland
Sure, that sounds good in theory, but in practice, on Twitter, this logic is used to try and inject Actual White Supremacy into a debate.
4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
I come from Kansas, my family is religious, I get it, there are many good ideas. But non-intersectional often means blissfully ignorant.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
"Non-intersectional" is when biz's and police fly rainbow flags, but turn around and make black trans ppl's lives hell, ignorant of history
5 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
"Non-intersectional" strikes me as like campaigning on tax breaks, but then only ever cutting taxes for the upper-class.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Well, it isn't.That's conservatism. If ur going to attack strawmen rather than addressing the actual essays I've sent you,I'll leave it here
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.