Well, conversations on Twitter aren't 100% guaranteed to result in someone changing their mind.... 
-
-
-
Replying to @HPluckrose
OK, back. My position is a) I use humanist/positivist principles as the basis for my own choices, because that's in line with how I think...
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @burtonad @HPluckrose
... b) many deeply moral and ethical people use religious teaching and principles as the basis for their choices. I don't think "I have...
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @burtonad @HPluckrose
... the better of this argument." IOW, I don't see atheism/positivism as self-evidently superior to religion/natural law principles.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @burtonad @HPluckrose
So saying "I look to...." is different (to me) to saying "we should look to." Does that make sense?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @burtonad
Does it make sense that people base their morality on different premises? Of course. We can still argue for better & worse ones tho.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @burtonad
If Christians are right & a God exists that tortures disbelievers for all eternity, the moral thing to do wld be to force belief hard.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @burtonad
Kill or otherwise remove from society people who spread doubt. Ban homosexuality. Forbid women from speaking in church etc.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @burtonad
Save as many people as you possibly can from such an awful fate by whatever means possible.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Because the end imperative is always human wellbeing. Take God out of the picture & it still is. But don't have to deny human rights.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.