The point is not what you think of Milo but whether we should ban ideas we think are hateful. Not agreeing on which are strengthens a 'no.'
-
-
Replying to @HPluckrose @CBLK08
We shouldn't ban ideas. Ideas don't hurt people, people do that. Because at the core hateful "ideas" are the result of hateful people
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @CommonSenseUSA3 @CBLK08
Or people you see as hateful because they have strong opinions that oppose your own.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @HPluckrose @CBLK08
Well again back to "everyone's reality is subjectively true" crap. If feminists see Milo as hateful in their mind he is.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
It's an important tactic for them though. To label people negative adjectives. It allows them to follow Alinsky's rules for radicals
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
If they isolate a figure, control the narrative on said figure and direct opposition based on emotion against him or her they can win by...
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
..merit of emotional appeal ergo virtue signalling. "Look how hateful he is. Im the opposite. Agree with me or you're a bigot"
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @CommonSenseUSA3 @CBLK08
This is just tribalism. Assume I am talking about people making sincere arguments for banning certain types of speech coz they think harmful
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @HPluckrose @CBLK08
See thats where I disagree. Tribalism manifests into hate. People attribute a ideology or belief so much to the core of their being that...
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
..any attack against it is an attack on their very being as a organism. So ergo everyone who attacks your beliefs is an enemy and subject to
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Yes, yes, we all know this.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.