And I have a thing coming out on the problem of conflating them in a few days. I use the example of Islamic modesty codes.
-
-
-
Replying to @CBLK08
It's awaiting editing at the moment. I say that we can both support ppl's right to comply with gender-specific modesty codes...
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @HPluckrose @CBLK08
... and be very critical of the idea of gender-specific modesty codes.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @CBLK08
In same way that we can support a gay man's choice to be celibate coz he thinks gay sex is a sin but not accept idea that gay sex is a sin
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
I agree this respect 4 the opinions of others allows true "choice". Note: this attitude was that of my Goldwater Republican family. I'm lib
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @CBLK08
But I'd very firmly separate 'respecting the opinions of others' from 'respecting the rights of others to have opinions you don't respect'
3 replies 6 retweets 11 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @CBLK08
Because so often these get conflated & ppl make one of two errors: 1) Thinking they must respect the idea itself to respect the right to it.
1 reply 1 retweet 2 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @CBLK08
2) Thinking that not respecting an idea justifies not respecting the right to it. These are essentially the same but manifest differently.
2 replies 1 retweet 1 like -
You're critical of gender identity theory and so shouldn't be allowed to speak coz this is violence against trans people.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

