Ooh! My old Early Modern lit prof just liked my essay criticising PoMo forms of feminism on Facebook. Will have to see if she's free for tea
Yes, this is the consequentialist element which is more important. The discussion on the merits of various ideas is a different element.
-
-
and those labeled liberal "elites"-- elites having taken the step to analysis of ideas "about" thinking and it's process to a step 2.
-
Sorry, you've lost me.
-
And that ability or desire to do so is where I see those who *should* be doing so legislatively get labeled as "liberal elites" 2.
-
If we get too abstract about principles over consequences?
-
They should be able and willing to do deep analysis of ideas to determine the most balanced even-handed policies. Not deterred instead. 2.
-
Absolutely!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
The less abstract-thinking the legislator, the more blunt the policy. I digress
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
many have not, for a variety of reasons; this is where nuance in policy matters get stuck legislatively. 3.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Now here we start to see the general breaking-down point--in my observation at least-- between the general (current) public 1.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.