I'm muting you now. The disingenuousness is too much.
Seems you saw a different point better to me. I thought it was that governments are death squads & public health care kills just as many
-
-
as no public health care. Took him for a conspiracy theorist of the most hyperbolic kind. But you say not so not sure what happened.
-
You can see that people were willing to donate 1.6 million to help this kid, his point is that this is what it should happen, free choice.
-
No article. Public health care does have to limit services, yes, but ppl should still have access to it coz not all can afford private.
-
I agree with that, he doesn't. He believes that people should help each other not the government.
-
Someone else was arguing that that would happen if it didn't exist but it doesn't. Where there is no public healthcare, people die.
-
American bloke was saying charities would pick up the slack but that didn't happen before ACA. Ppl w/out insurance suffered & died.
-
But it's more complex that this. If you ever come to Oslo we can meet and talk about this, me and
@vekox if his available. - 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Public health that is funded with taxes can kill because, as this article points out removes options from people.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.