Yes, there's a political element - a revolutionary one. There always was. I still think they believe in it.
-
-
The dishonesty is intellectual. They believe in their religion or in PoMo but soften or strengthen claims
-
Well, a lot of it is rationalisation. They believe in it because they need to justify its use for some purpose or another.
-
And we see the aims because of the inconsistent way they do this. But I still think they deceive themselves
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Yeah this is always the shift in pragmatic epistemologies. It's ridiculous because "it works" is still a true or false proposition.
-
So they're not even shifting epistemologically as they think; they're just shifting to a different proposition. It's a type of bait/switch.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.