And our understanding of the world is ever evolving. A problem with faith-based and other broken epistemologies is they don't evolve with it
-
-
I'm sure it's at least part of it. I do also think exploration isn't worth much unless the discoveries are subjected to objective scrutiny.
-
Can't really do that on Twitter but understanding how ppl think, what they want is interesting & useful.
-
This is why I love Jonathan Haidt. Understanding different mindsets. Why I'm in the humanities.
-
I'm interested in psychology too and I meant PoMo and religion were psychologically (mind-function) equivalent in that other thread.
-
In both people are appealing to their intuitive and experiential biases. Just different words for it.
-
Different mindsets. You can reach a jihadi type by influencing him to change his premise. Not so with some1 vague & mystical.
-
The idealist type can switch from system to system but take them all literally & to extremes. See Dan Arel.
-
The vague mystical type might just add bits & lose bits but never be literal or logical.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
