Don't most women oppose shared custody because of the implications for the stream of financial payments they would receive? /1
-
-
Replying to @BeatConfusion @HPluckrose and
First, if custody is 50:50 then there is no child support. Second, access is a marvellous lever to extract alimony + child support. /2
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BeatConfusion @HPluckrose and
To test this, one would just need to tabulate access arrangements when fathers have paid-up-in-full vs. are in arrears. 3/3
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Yes, although there could be other reasons if they correlate.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @BeatConfusion and
If my ex stopped paying for his child's upkeep, I wld become suspicious of how much he cared.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Many support arrangements call for a man to provide something like 55% of his after-tax income. That may not always be possible overnight.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BeatConfusion @HPluckrose and
There is a general lack of awareness of the extent of these burdens. Newly divorced men are also of course legitimately seeking new company.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BeatConfusion
That's a diff issue tho. I'm thinking of reasons a lack of financial support from father cld be good reason to stop custody
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @BeatConfusion
When affordable financial support which is needed is withheld, can indicate an irresponsible parent in other ways.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
Are you referring to substance abuse and other addictive/distracted behaviour? Anything else?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Just bad or neglectful parenting. If it shows up in one form, could do in others.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.