I'd file the fact that men outperform women athletically under things that are true but mostly irrelevant. https://twitter.com/NoahPollak/status/879199867855413248 …
-
-
It's possible for things to be true but also not needed to be pointed out all the time.
-
An obvious example of this is men's greater propensity for violence which gets pointed out ad nauseum for moralistic purposes.
-
So, as to whether it's anti-science to object to gender differences being pointed out often depends on why they're being pointed out.
-
If the context in which they're pointed out is science, it almost certainly is. If it's moral, ideological, political, it might not be.
-
If there are now demands for McEnroe to apologise & be disinvited to things, this will be a different issue & one that needs countering.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
The Williams sisters boasted about being able to beat the men under the top 200. A player at the 203rd place took the challenge and won.
-
They corrected their claim to the top 350, so the comment is relevant, there is an history here.
-
'an history'. Your Frenchness is showing. :)
-
Oh noes ;(
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
My cousins in Israel, Very tough women, you fricking kidding me, sweet, but they can knock some blicks off
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This bit... not quite true. They can't compete at 100m. But at 100miles women beat men. By a lot. Read "Born to run" for lots of examples.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.