People must have the right to express any *ideas* they like but know that there are consequences for defaming *individuals*
-
-
-
If you want to argue that Muslim Reform is anti-Muslim extremism, knock yourself out. You'll look like an idiot but it's your call.
-
Targeting individuals & calling them anti-Muslim extremists despite mountains of evidence to the contrary is an entirely different matter.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
But if someone, say, called Linda Sarsour an Islamist, would she have the right to sue?
-
I'm not sure legally by definitions of the word or what LS believes. I know they couldn't show Maajid to be anti-Muslim extremist.
-
But is the accusation of being an anti-Muslim Extremist or an Islamist really something to prove/disprove in a lawsuit?
-
Yes! If someone is defamed, the other needs to prove that label can be justified or retract it & pay the consequences.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Agree entirely. Just another attempt to try and curtail free speech by demonising those with the temerity to exercise it.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It will be very difficult. The splc has a lot of money. They used to do good work. Now they have become radical leftist smear merchants
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This pisses me off because they SPLC used to be a pretty valuable outfit. I suspect they made the flaw of hiring people under 45.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.