Or did you not mean morally? Factually, we know some things, other things are probable, possible, unknown etc
-
-
-
-
Replying to @HPluckrose @herewardwakeful
We have ways of reading & interpretation & things but then we don't claim truth so not a problem.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
Wittgenstein, Nietzsche to name just a few recent but pre pomo writers that write on problems of truth/facts/language/power
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @herewardwakeful
What about them? We're at cross purposes I think.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
History and philosophy cannot be concerned with pure fact. They are intertwined with interpretation and power. See above writers.
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @herewardwakeful @HPluckrose
Given this, we cannot simply dismiss Foucault's various characterisations of knowledge without a more in depth study.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @herewardwakeful
There are many. You saw the specific legacy I'm concerned about?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
I wrote an essay about it. I sent it to you. Can we leave it here?
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
The arts don't but history, philosophy?