Right & wrong aren't knowledge. You need an ethical premise & to argue for it.
-
-
Replying to @HPluckrose @herewardwakeful
Or did you not mean morally? Factually, we know some things, other things are probable, possible, unknown etc
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
-
Replying to @HPluckrose @herewardwakeful
We have ways of reading & interpretation & things but then we don't claim truth so not a problem.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
Wittgenstein, Nietzsche to name just a few recent but pre pomo writers that write on problems of truth/facts/language/power
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @herewardwakeful
What about them? We're at cross purposes I think.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
History and philosophy cannot be concerned with pure fact. They are intertwined with interpretation and power. See above writers.
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @herewardwakeful @HPluckrose
One that involves Nietzsche and so forth. Meanwhile, it's easy to dismiss SJWs without mischaracterising Foucault. Too much work when all..
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @herewardwakeful @HPluckrose
You need to do is point out contradictions and their misuse of accomplished writers.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
The arts don't but history, philosophy?