Well, now we're back in knowledge. I write about things people said & did due to records we have.
-
-
Replying to @HPluckrose @ChrisDoveton
It seems to me that those things make this knowledge historically situated. This is a basic or obvious statement but important.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @herewardwakeful @ChrisDoveton
People knew different things in different times. Right & wrong answers still exist & knowledge builds.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @ChrisDoveton
To an extent but this is a complex area. Right and wrong are clearly very difficult. This area is one of those where you can't easily just..
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @herewardwakeful @ChrisDoveton
Right & wrong aren't knowledge. You need an ethical premise & to argue for it.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @herewardwakeful
Or did you not mean morally? Factually, we know some things, other things are probable, possible, unknown etc
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
-
Replying to @HPluckrose @herewardwakeful
We have ways of reading & interpretation & things but then we don't claim truth so not a problem.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
The complexities of reading and interpretation are some of the subject matter of these writers. Again not easy to dismiss them.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Well, it is but its also not the point. Epistemic relativity is.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
The arts don't but history, philosophy?