Yes but our inability to accurately describe it through language is not trivial.
Or did you not mean morally? Factually, we know some things, other things are probable, possible, unknown etc
-
-
Humanities does not and cannot work on facts.
-
The arts don't but history, philosophy? -
We have ways of reading & interpretation & things but then we don't claim truth so not a problem.
-
Wittgenstein, Nietzsche to name just a few recent but pre pomo writers that write on problems of truth/facts/language/power
-
What about them? We're at cross purposes I think.
-
History and philosophy cannot be concerned with pure fact. They are intertwined with interpretation and power. See above writers.
-
I have. That's the point... This is just an assertion.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.