Trivially true. Objective reality still exists.
Right & wrong aren't knowledge. You need an ethical premise & to argue for it.
-
-
Or did you not mean morally? Factually, we know some things, other things are probable, possible, unknown etc
-
Humanities does not and cannot work on facts.
-
The arts don't but history, philosophy? -
We have ways of reading & interpretation & things but then we don't claim truth so not a problem.
-
Wittgenstein, Nietzsche to name just a few recent but pre pomo writers that write on problems of truth/facts/language/power
-
What about them? We're at cross purposes I think.
-
History and philosophy cannot be concerned with pure fact. They are intertwined with interpretation and power. See above writers.
-
I have. That's the point... This is just an assertion.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I mean right and wrong answers in the sense of your above tweet
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.