No, criticisms of PoMo aren't either academic or reactionary. Reasonable people w/out an academic background in it can see &discuss problemshttps://twitter.com/ChrisDoveton/status/878239600409362432 …
-
-
Replying to @HPluckrose
I've provided my counter argument using my own reasoning, which is deeply incommensurable with yours. These are academic arguments.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ChrisDoveton @HPluckrose
Seems pretty clear to me. 'SJWs' bear little if any relationship to PoMo. They have no credibility. PoMo is often generalised.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @HPluckrose @ChrisDoveton
I am not against what you are trying to do but do not find the article convincing regarding Foucault. Haven't studied Derrida.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
You have one inaccurate quote in first Foucault segment. Foucault's ideas of discourse and power apply strongly to current SJW situation.
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
I mean, Inacc. quote from a critic of his. Foucault also writing before the introduction of term Postmodernism.
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
OK. Which? Yes, & many of the early PoMos denied being PoMos anyway.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.