His phrasing is purposeful and ignores that the word choice evident on even his own tweet creates situations that would resemble his tweet
Tweet says that people who praise you for saying that a man is making unsubstantiated claims will object if u make same criticism of woman
-
-
And that is the nicest version of how people usually "call out" women for unsubstantiated claims. Ignoring this nuance is my issue
-
No, it isn't. We can also talk about the problem I have raised which is undermining & disempowering women in academia & in feminism.
-
We can have that conversation but it is different from the conversation we are currently having and thus only tangentially related
-
As I have said, I think it clearly was the point and am bemused that you don't see this. But this is an impasse so let's leave it here.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Versus "Hey what does that woman think she is doing making claims she can't support with facts." These would result in different responses
-
Well, I think you're wrong and have said why. Mindreading is less useful than discussing the gender imbalance.
-
Not mindreading, tweet reading. I also believe you're wrong on this particular issue. I don't see us agreeing but thank you for the convo
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Again I stand by the phrasing used reads as such. "Hey that guys is making claims he can't support with facts"
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
