It wouldn't make sense if it meant 'The same people who think this is OK, think something completely different is bad' now, would it?
-
-
Replying to @HPluckrose @peterboghossian
His phrasing is purposeful and ignores that the word choice evident on even his own tweet creates situations that would resemble his tweet
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
You figured all that out from 140 characters?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
I figured out how many people, Boghossian included, will ignore nuance in 140 characters.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
"Boghossian included" - only U know what Boghossian meant by his "purposeful" phrasing. Not even Boghossian knows Boghossian's purpose.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Not what I said but interesting interpretation. I said he is purposely ignoring nuance with his statement and everyone is blindly agreeing
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Not blindly, no. The problem of this kind of double standards is one that many have addressed. Here I do:pic.twitter.com/EvI47kn5D5
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @ORly_Fred and
We can all think of reasons to explain reasonably why any individual man's ideas might be engaged w differently than any individual woman's
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @ORly_Fred and
But the problem of women's ideas not being as open to critique as men's *because they are a woman* is what is being addressed here.
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Also if Boghossian hadn't recently shown a propensity for being anti this exact statement and your stated purpose for it
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Sorry, I don't understand. You think Peter doesn't want women to be taken as seriously as men? I'd be astonished if he didn't.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.