You figured all that out from 140 characters?
-
-
I figured out how many people, Boghossian included, will ignore nuance in 140 characters.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
"Boghossian included" - only U know what Boghossian meant by his "purposeful" phrasing. Not even Boghossian knows Boghossian's purpose.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Not what I said but interesting interpretation. I said he is purposely ignoring nuance with his statement and everyone is blindly agreeing
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Not blindly, no. The problem of this kind of double standards is one that many have addressed. Here I do:pic.twitter.com/EvI47kn5D5
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @ORly_Fred and
We can all think of reasons to explain reasonably why any individual man's ideas might be engaged w differently than any individual woman's
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @ORly_Fred and
But the problem of women's ideas not being as open to critique as men's *because they are a woman* is what is being addressed here.
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
True. If it didn't ignore the nuance of why people might respond on a certain way to either situation.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
We have to be able to address the ways people could be treated differently *because of* their gender. It matters.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @ORly_Fred and
If you don't want to address the premise as it is - people are more accepting of criticism of unsubstantiated claims by men than by women...
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
...then don't but it is OK to address this. I want to for reasons I've given. Those people are feminists & I feel they're disempowering us
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.