Not technically, no. This wld not be an example of a society in which men have all the power unless they did that first &then made that rule
-
-
Replying to @HPluckrose @GodDoesnt
But is the word "all" there essential to the idea of patriarchy, as propounded by most feminists?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Friedmanzone @GodDoesnt
Feminists are incoherent on the subject. They have no working definition of patriarchy but see it in everything.
4 replies 3 retweets 7 likes -
destroy one patriarchy and a new one takes its place. it's in men's nature to try and control not only women but each other. no ghosts here.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Oh bollocks.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
I suppose you can't explain why.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
I think your categorical, unsupported claim requires categorical evidence. It's no one else's job to disprove it.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Just say you can't or don't want to explain. No one is obligated to do so, obviously.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Explain what? You're the one making a very categorical claim. If you present some empirical evidence for it, maybe we could make progress.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Helen gets it. You don't apparently
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
No, I agree that it was you who made a bizarre claim & so need to defend it. I just responded anyway. But you do need to do that.
-
-
I have been defending my claims, just as you have been making your own ("bollocks", "bizarre")
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.