It does try to. That's the problem. Obviously male violence will look like misogyny if you only look at vaw.https://twitter.com/pseudonymous_me/status/876762834314567680 …
-
-
This is the difference between recognising a criminal in need of supervision/confinement & help with rage & a misogynist..
@pseudonymous_me -
...in need of supervision/confinement & help with his hatred of women. Motivations matter if you want to fix things.
@pseudonymous_me -
Extend to a whole society & consider whether male violence committed mostly against men indicates a misogynistic society.
@pseudonymous_me -
Or whether it indicates a society which contains violent men, the victims of whom are sometimes women.
@pseudonymous_me -
The best way to tell whether a society valorises or condones VAW is not selected stats but whether it does that.
@pseudonymous_me -
In societies in which VAW is illegal, men who commit it despised, prosecuted &sentenced way more harshly than other way, no@pseudonymous_me
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
There is no possible conclusion when people can't even ask what happened before the man hit the woman.
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Actually, if you don't know anything, you still couldn't conclude anything about his motivations.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
If I hear some1 hit some1 else, I conclude...it's maybe more complex. Unless it's like a deer hunter shooting a dear, which isn't personal.
-
That's not to say killing deer is ok, just because it's not personal. The fact that it isn't personal is what confuses me... But I digress.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.