1/ obviously, people on London Bridge is a target. But you don't know that they are all Christians, capitalists etc. And they don't care
-
-
Replying to @colwight
No. Random attacks will always include people who don't hold the values terrorists are targetting. But pereived as representing them.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @colwight
They wouldn't have done it if they'd been in Pakistan. It was an attack on the British public even tho many non-Brits got hurt.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
No it was an attack on British Muslims. Ask those attacked.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @HPluckrose
Twitter not great for this. Crossed wires doesn't come close.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @colwight
Honestly, it's fine. Not the point. I'm leaving it here.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
Lol. Well my point is that we shouldn't be jumping to conclusions on any of these attacks to early.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @colwight
And mine is that claims that no-one is calling this terrorism because the attacker is white are demonstrably false.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
Lol, yes and because it's false, then it means some are prematurely calling it terrorism, when it may not be. So we're both right.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Well, the police are calling it 'potential terrorism' to be fair which they did at first with the recent Muslim attacks too.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.