& by 'empirically managed' i assume that you are referring to policy. i prefer the term empirically culled for that. empirics is one element
At least then I'd know what you're getting at. No need for all this vague meandering about never actually saying anything.
-
-
Harris was mentioned in passing but there are others like him. You seem to be in denial that such problems exist
-
I've said nothing at all about this & I still don't know what you're talking about in relationship to it.
-
I can honestly say I have little knowledge and no opinion on the matter of scientists getting involved in public policy.
-
You're obviously not to explain straightforwardly what your point is and how it relates to anything I've said & this is a pattern with you.
-
There are too many interesting people here who make clear, well-argued & relevant points to be wasting time with vague & pompous waffle.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
and the boundaries of technical expertise in public policy. Much has been written and discussed on those issues
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.