Not sure that's possible. People don't really work like that. Can take a personal approach that doesn't involve saying other terrible personhttps://twitter.com/BeatConfusion/status/875995522720563202 …
-
-
Replying to @HPluckrose
Is it not an extension of an implicit agreement to follow universal logical rules of the road; specifically to avoid a type of ad hominem?
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @BeatConfusion
Yes, but it won't help us if people don't work like that & their motivations are personal & emotional.Meeting them on a personal level helps
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @HPluckrose
You are an impressively tolerant and sociable person to be willing to go to that place with folks you don't know.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BeatConfusion
:) Not really. It's where I come from & what interests me. The way people think & their motivations for thinking it.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @BeatConfusion
Understanding this in individuals gives us a way to present the good arguments in a way that will resonate with them. A la Jonathan Haidt.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @HPluckrose
Understanding pre-existing intellectual commitments and concerns/interests is productive in that sense.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @BeatConfusion @HPluckrose
But do you share my concern when the references are to elements of ascriptive identity? "As a privileged white male, you would say that."
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
-
-
Replying to @HPluckrose
Damn. We're in violent agreement, again. Just when it looked like a good debate was getting off the ground.
0 replies 0 retweets 1 likeThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.