We're back to the original problem. Do I take it you are in favour of farm animals not getting to live at all?
If we were able to ensure that animals had pleasurable lives with least suffering & could do this without being in the control of humans...
-
-
My point is that IF we breed them, we have a duty to minimize suffering. But if we liberate them, we don't, and they could fare well.
-
I get that. That's why I said its not an argument for reducing suffering or death. It won't do that. We just won't be responsible for it.
-
It seems you can't be purely utilitarian here. Wouldn't it suggest we go out and alleviate the suffering of wild animals?
-
I think we need to stay in the situation we have re animals currently dependant on us & whether that is better for them or not.
-
I think we should think of farm animals as having the same moral worth as pets. If we breed them, we care for them. No premature death.
-
I know and now we're back to the beginning with the other two options & whether they're better for the animals or just for our consciences.
-
The purely moral thing to do would be to stop breeding immediately and take care of all living farm animals as we would pets.
-
And let them go extinct & no further pigs or cows to live at all. That would stop death & suffering but at the cost of life. Anti-natalism.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
...we'd have a perfect solution. Its not an option. Tho individuals can adopt individual animals obviously & make it an individual solution.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.