We can insist that our party leader express our values, or choose another party. If not, what's the point of the LibDems?
-
-
Replying to @BristolBen
We disagree on what those values are. I accept ppl with religious ideas of sexual morality who subordinate them to liberalism
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
And I hold people responsible for what they say. Their religion is none of my concern. Calling gay people sinful is unacceptable.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BristolBen @HPluckrose
If they don't act on those beliefs, all the better. But that doesn't excuse what they say.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BristolBen @HPluckrose
I'll give him credit for trying not to say it. But the damage is done.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
-
Replying to @BristolBen
I'm not upset. There's just no point in going on coz I'd only be repeating myself. I think we both understand each other.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
Update: A day later and I'm still unable to dismiss your point. I have to think about it more. It's tricky.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @BristolBen @HPluckrose
It's interesting watching you two on different sides.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
When it happens, it's usually coz I am more culturally libertarian than Ben.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.