On a public level, I can accept ppl having horrible ideas if the idea all ppl should have equal rights, freedoms & opportunities is stronger
-
-
Replying to @HPluckrose
Eg, if someone thinks women are less capable than men or that homosexuality is wrong but advocates fully equal rights & opportunities.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @HPluckrose
I can even respect this person on a detached level for upholding liberal principles which go against their beliefs. Its all we can ask.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
I think religion is awful but defend religious freedom in the same way (tho obv I think I have much better justification)
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
I could neither accept or respect such a person on a personal level. Sometimes I think people confuse these two levels.
2 replies 0 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
Or they confuse respecting a person's commitment to subordinating their personal belief to universal liberalism for respecting the belief.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
But we cld respect a religious conservative for supporting same sex marriage coz he feels his beliefs shld only apply to him on 1 level 1/2
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
And argue furiously with him about having a problem with it in the first place on another level. 2/2
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
I don't think this is inconsistent. It depends so much on what we feel we have a right to expect from people in different arenas.
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
this sounds more like a hurt feelings argument or rather like a normalisation argument
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
I don't know what that means in relation to what I said.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.