But its half true, most women don't like the hard sciences. This is why I'm not a postmodernist, - biology.
-
-
That's not proven, and couldn't be in a culture that is actively dissuading women from joining the sciences. It also seems implausible.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Well, we don't have one of those. Constant clamouring to get more women into STEM as tho female-dominated fields are worth less.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
It is good that progress is being made, but this is thousands of years of social conditioning, it won't go away overnight.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
No, its not. That's silly. Since we've had access to everything, women have come to dominate important fields very quickly.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
This was last year: http://fortune.com/2016/06/06/women-ceos-fortune-500-2016/ …
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Materialism again. Working that job takes a mutant of a human to succeed. Who even wants to? Those people work nightmarish hours.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
But I know many women who work their asses off and could do those jobs. Assuming they can't is one problem PoMo attacks.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Assuming that these jobs are desirable is a wrong assumption of pomo materialism.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Yes! There simply is no reason to assume that working yourself to death in a highly aggressive field is the ultimate achievement.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
Many people want to get a better life/work balance, do something more intellectually or socially satisfying. More of those are women.
-
-
That may be true in a 60/40 split kinda way, but is the difference so stark as to explain only 4% female fortune 500 CEOs?
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.