These "attempts" at a sophisticated straw man fallacy to avoid addressing the male victimhood complex against feminism in skepticism. SAD!
https://twitter.com/GodDoesnt/status/875389415992037376 …
-
-
Many prominent skeptics claimed exactly that. PoMo is not terrible, it's just a vague and misunderstood term for critical analysis of cultur
-
People are very precise about what they are criticising. I set out the biggest problems I see here.https://areomagazine.com/2017/03/27/how-french-intellectuals-ruined-the-west-postmodernism-and-its-impact-explained/ …
-
I'm glad that you are precise in your criticisms, really prominent individuals have been less so. Thank you for your work and dialogue here.
-
Not really. They are also highlighting specific problems. Science-denial, radical constructivism, idpol, intense sensitivity to language
-
Those problems have been discussed extensively, but aren't unique to GS or PoMo, and many of us are working to synthesize the next step.
-
PoMo valorises them. It advocates them. It is them.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.