On a public level, I can accept ppl having horrible ideas if the idea all ppl should have equal rights, freedoms & opportunities is stronger
-
-
Or they confuse respecting a person's commitment to subordinating their personal belief to universal liberalism for respecting the belief.
-
But we cld respect a religious conservative for supporting same sex marriage coz he feels his beliefs shld only apply to him on 1 level 1/2
-
And argue furiously with him about having a problem with it in the first place on another level. 2/2
-
I don't think this is inconsistent. It depends so much on what we feel we have a right to expect from people in different arenas.
-
this sounds more like a hurt feelings argument or rather like a normalisation argument
-
I don't know what that means in relation to what I said.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
so you only accept people who agree with your views? thats interesting. what happens if they have poor character?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.