That is incompatible with the goals of the LibDems. Not letting this interfere with his policies is an good example to set but...
Also, I don't think it did because I respect ppl who support rights they don't think good themselves but we've been here.
-
-
We have indeed and your point is valid. For me, it just doesn't compensate the harm done to gay acceptance.
-
If even the LibDem leader can get away with saying that homosexuality is sin, disorderly, etc, then who can't?
-
Not denying it fast enough, you mean. We must never let ppl get away with not denying their beliefs fast enough.
-
His views are now public. It doesn't really matter how they got there. Was it unfair? Sure. Irrelevant now.
-
I'd criticise the attitude which led to him being badgered & the response which is illiberal.
-
I'd criticise the attitude too (ethics in journalism). But after Tim said what he said, the response was normal.
-
Obviously I disagree. I can't explain why again.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.