Nobody is proposing to ban the religious. It's about support on the issues. Either you do or you don't support, religious or not.
-
-
Replying to @BristolBen
Religious ppl who believe what their religion says, if you prefer. Don't require thought policing. Policies matter.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @HPluckrose @BristolBen
If someone says ' my personal beliefs say this but my liberalism requires me to subordinate those to liberalism & I will' - fine
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @HPluckrose
If he says that his personal beliefs are that homosexuality is a sin, that is a problem. Whatever his voting record.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BristolBen
Why? Why can't ppl believe their own thing but support liberal policies? Why do we all have to have the same beliefs too?
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
We disagree on what "support" implies. Me: Saying that gay sex is a sin is being *unsupportive* of gays. That is why it's a problem.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BristolBen
But do you hear me saying he has no intention of saying that? That he tried very hard not to say that?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @BristolBen
Problem seems to be that he *thought* that inside his own head where it harms no-one but ppl felt they had right to force him
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @BristolBen
to say what Christianity says about it. He probably also thinks sex before marriage & pride is a sin.
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @BristolBen
Taking the name of the lord in vain & feeling list, envy or anger. Weird but what matters is what he says & does as politician.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
Did you see the thing I wrote on this?
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.