Lol
-
-
Replying to @elibosnick @helpfulatheist3 and
This is the most decent and honest
@GodDoesnt could muster? https://youtu.be/e4R5-y0Dc1s1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @martirib @elibosnick and
TLDW: A female scientist describing rape and death threats at the end is the relevant part.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @martirib @elibosnick and
How would that be relevant to the paper itself?
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
-
Replying to @elibosnick @helpfulatheist3 and
What a mind blowing level of lack of empathy. I would be incredibly ashamed of that tweet. Your better than that.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @elibosnick @martirib and
How are rape threats relevant to the accuracy of the paper? That's my question.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
-
Replying to @martirib @elibosnick and
That's not an answer. James brought up the glacier paper as a shitty paper. How are death threats relevant to that?
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @helpfulatheist3 @martirib and
BECAUSE EVEN IF IT WAS A SHITTY PAPER (it's not) DEATH THREATS ARE INDICATIVE OF A MUCH LARGER PROBLEM ARWNT THEY???
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes
Yes. Has any1 suggested death threats don't exist & aren't a problem? How does this relate to whether feminism helps us understand glaciers?
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.