Why isn't it clear that if neither 'side' is getting important things right, we shouldn't pick one?
-
-
-
Because the empty-headed numpties insisting it's one side or the other oppose getting things done. They have no purpose without conflict.
-
Many people seem to have a deep and abiding *need* to have a side/team.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Don't know that person, but I'm guessing they're a blockbotter. Can't see it.
-
It's Dan Arel. 'The irony is,centrist atheists will tell agnostics they need to pick a side while pretending political agnosticism is noble'
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Why is political centrism = political agnosticism? As usual he makes zero sense while diligently framing his ideas to make himself feel good
-
Religious agnosticism is a state of not knowing. Political centrism is a state of choosing individual issues over party loyalty.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.