I made a 'no arguing about evolution on Twitter' rule a long time ago & I'm sticking to it. There's just so much information available. https://twitter.com/DubuissonPaul/status/873902606711529472 …
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @HPluckrose
And yet, it's practically inconsequential in the big picture. Isaac Newton believed in "intelligent design" - and to what ill effect?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @rhodeislander
Fortunately the picture is bigger than Newton or science, medicine & psychology would be much poorer.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
Agree on some level, but people can deny evolution and still be great doctors and scientists. Religion and science not mutually exclusive.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @rhodeislander
Religion & science can co-exist but are antithetical. I cld be a great historian and believe in pixies. Doesn't mean history supports pixies
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
I'm not sure I'd go that far. Religion has spurred the interest in inquiry in some of history's greatest scientists. Agree that faith != sci
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @rhodeislander
Again, not connected tho. If I was inspired to study science coz I believed goblins were telling me to, it wld say nothing abt goblins.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
I see your point, but some people are trying make an equally fallacious opposite point - belief in religion invalidates scientists totally.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
If they are, argue with them. It's certainly not related to my point that there is much evidence for evolution even if religious ppl say no.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.