You just can't credibly invalidate fundamental bases of liberal democracy like not responding violently to speech by calling them 'fetishes'https://twitter.com/uberfeminist/status/873389598570815488 …
-
-
Just when it concerns them. Free speech matters when religion needs to be critisized. Or sometimes, certain religions.
-
But they don't make the argument that they shld be allowed to criticise it coz free speech. They say they should coz they're right
-
And seem oblivious to the fact that others think they're right too & use same argument to persecute atheists & that atheists are minority
-
Trying to generalize atheists is like trying to generalize all of religion. We have no Creed, no holy text, no authorities.
-
Yes. I have said this myself many times and am not doing this. The people arguing against Dan Arel et al are also mostly atheists.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.