You just can't credibly invalidate fundamental bases of liberal democracy like not responding violently to speech by calling them 'fetishes'https://twitter.com/uberfeminist/status/873389598570815488 …
-
-
Nor can you claim violence is justified because its consequence is frightening ppl out of speaking. That's the main argument against it.
-
I know I keep saying this but its incredible that *atheists* are trying to normalise violence against ppl expressing ideas found appalling.
-
Atheists can be hypocrites too, you know.
-
They're not hypocrites. They don't claim to support free speech for all ideas. What's incredible is that they don't realise they should.
-
Just when it concerns them. Free speech matters when religion needs to be critisized. Or sometimes, certain religions.
-
But they don't make the argument that they shld be allowed to criticise it coz free speech. They say they should coz they're right
-
And seem oblivious to the fact that others think they're right too & use same argument to persecute atheists & that atheists are minority
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.