It is, is it? I get lost when Christian takes his Platonism into the realms of maths. Sometimes, I think that's why he does it. ;-)
-
-
I don't think it really is and I'm only chiming in on it because it's being used to argue against physicalism.
-
Because although it's true that the concepts don't exist in genes or the environment, does this tell us anything except that concepts don't?
-
I don't think so. Math is just used to create internally coherent models of the world. The interest in args over platonism are lost on me
-
At least until someone tries to argue that they cash out substance dualism.
-
I think that is the claim. I am dubious of it but have no right to be because I don't understand maths well enough.
-
The core point I'm making is that even if they did "exist," there's no reason to not posit that they exist as part of the physical world.
-
Even if they have no materiality? I am hoping James is about to explain this in terms I can understand.
-
There are multiple ontological ways for things to exist. Mass "exists" as a property, for instance, even though it's just a description.
- 15 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.