I agree. This is a pretty standard MRA view, unlike @HPluckrose's contention that MRAs see only female advantages but no male advantages. https://twitter.com/NixNayno/status/871291625728745476 …
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @melliflora
@NixNayno@MissyDemeanour@TakedownMRAs @JoelRDodd This is why I explicitly said 'some' or 'many.' Reasonable MRAs & fems exist2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @HPluckrose @NixNayno and
Your exact words, Helen: "The problem is that feminists only see male advantages and MRAs only female." Nothing about "some" or "many."
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @melliflora @NixNayno and
Oh yes. Well take it that way. Feminism & MRAism looks at those things.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @melliflora and
I'm aware that balanced people who use the labels still exist.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @NixNayno and
Yup. I've met feminist-identifying women who seem to be principled gender egalitarians. I've just never met a "Movement" feminist who was.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @melliflora @HPluckrose and
As for MRAs, I've encountered exactly 1 who thinks we live in a 10,000yo oppressive Matriarchy. And that was in an obscure zine decades ago.
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @melliflora
Good 4u. I meet ones who focus solely on the ways men are disadvantaged & claim everything set up to privilege women regularly
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
I'd argue we are a gynocentric species, so there's some truth there. But it doesn't mean women have no disadvantages & men no advantages.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
I wasn't talking about you. I'm going away now.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.