I agree. This is a pretty standard MRA view, unlike @HPluckrose's contention that MRAs see only female advantages but no male advantages. https://twitter.com/NixNayno/status/871291625728745476 …
-
-
Your exact words, Helen: "The problem is that feminists only see male advantages and MRAs only female." Nothing about "some" or "many."
-
Oh yes. Well take it that way. Feminism & MRAism looks at those things.
-
I'm aware that balanced people who use the labels still exist.
-
Yup. I've met feminist-identifying women who seem to be principled gender egalitarians. I've just never met a "Movement" feminist who was.
-
As for MRAs, I've encountered exactly 1 who thinks we live in a 10,000yo oppressive Matriarchy. And that was in an obscure zine decades ago.
-
Good 4u. I meet ones who focus solely on the ways men are disadvantaged & claim everything set up to privilege women regularly
-
I'd argue we are a gynocentric species, so there's some truth there. But it doesn't mean women have no disadvantages & men no advantages.
-
I wasn't talking about you. I'm going away now.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.