Exactly. When ppl read abt the hoax & responded 'Gender Studies is a mess', they'd not suddenly come to that conclusion due to the hoax! https://twitter.com/GodDoesnt/status/867134296057929728 …
It did actually happen. We didn't just think it did. Still open to good stuff coming from it.
-
-
In the same way, I enjoy satire against religion but remain open to evidence of God's existence.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Seralini's mice "studies," weren't made up, either. Submitting to ever less prestigious journals. P-hacking. I see little difference.
-
Ex 1: I have a theory, gender studies is intellectually flawed. I'm rejected at NORMA, but submit to another. Look, I proved my point!
-
That's a refutation of a claim a hoax alone proves GS worthless but my point was opposite.https://twitter.com/HPluckrose/status/867136017123422213 …
-
That the hoax confirms people's existing conclusion (bias)? Like Wakefield did for vaccines being bad? Seralini for GMO's being unhealthy?
-
Ppl are certainly using it to confirm biases rather than taking it as it is. Very interesting how they spin it.
-
I've not yet seen anyone say it alone invalidates gender studies tho!
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.