That doesn't, no. Ppl keep thinking one experience/example/hoax claims to do that. No.
If you mean the hoax, I agree.That was the point. If u mean the piece in skeptic abt it, its appropriate
-
-
Ppl look at public institutions in all sorts of ways, using all sorts of approaches & mediums.
-
You don't have to like satire or popular pieces but why get so angry if others do?
-
I get angry at bad reasoning, bad arguments, bad evidence. The 'hoax' is all three.
-
You're refuting claims that haven't been made. This is known as a strawman.
-
“The echo-chamber of morally driven fashionable nonsense coming out of the postmodernist social ‘sciences’ in general, & gender studies..."
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
You can't separate the two. Either we follow best practices or we don't. You can't do shit work in calling out others' shit work.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.