Been told I 'doomed women to an eternal beauty myth' by saying sexual selection is real
We can argue abt pay-to-publish. That was one of the targets. A lot of other journals similar rejection rate
-
-
I was discussing submitting a physics paper today to a very prestigious science journal and it was pay to publish.
-
Yes, that alone doesn't discredit it, does it? Simply a different way of funding.
-
Though other hoaxes have been published in physics journals. Should we say all of physics is bullshit? http://news.mit.edu/2015/how-three-mit-students-fooled-scientific-journals-0414 …
-
Remember, you don't need to refute claim that hoax alone discredits GS coz no-one is making it.
-
I've said this three times now & linked a longer thread about it. Why refute claims not made?
-
We can all agree that anyone arguing GS worthless coz of one hoax would be unreasonable.
-
I'll leave it here. Can't make any progress if you keep refuting claims not made.
-
I just quoted the actual claims made. They clearly think this is a sweeping indictment.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.