That doesn't, no. Ppl keep thinking one experience/example/hoax claims to do that. No.
-
-
Replying to @HPluckrose @YeyoZa and
@GodDoesnt seemed to claim that his hoax did, or something very close to it.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @SisyphusRedemed @YeyoZa and
No, they didn't. This is just what it's easiest to refute. 1 test. 1 result.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @YeyoZa and
Is that how scholarship works now? 'We have an N of 1. PUBLISH!!!!'
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @SisyphusRedemed @YeyoZa and
Is what how scholarship works? This is a twitter conversation.
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @HPluckrose @YeyoZa and
@GodDoesnt's article certainly seemed to present itself as scholarship. It was certainly ABOUT scholarship.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Hoax was aimed at scholarly publications. The denouement that it was satire was in Skeptic Magazine
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @SisyphusRedemed and
By all means, think a different approach wld have been better & perhaps do it yourself.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @SisyphusRedemed and
The hoax was what it was & we can all talk about what it shows. Interesting how differently ppl read it.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @HPluckrose @SisyphusRedemed and
What they choose to defend. Sometimes the papers argument. Sometimes the reputation of Gender Studies.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
This goes back & forth from whether argument sound or argument so ridiculous, must be a bad journal.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.