Been told I 'doomed women to an eternal beauty myth' by saying sexual selection is real
-
-
This isn't a Rorschach test. There are standards of good scholarship, and this paper failed to meet them (a serious irony/hypocrisy.)
-
If you mean the hoax, I agree.That was the point. If u mean the piece in skeptic abt it, its appropriate
-
Ppl look at public institutions in all sorts of ways, using all sorts of approaches & mediums.
-
You don't have to like satire or popular pieces but why get so angry if others do?
-
I get angry at bad reasoning, bad arguments, bad evidence. The 'hoax' is all three.
-
You're refuting claims that haven't been made. This is known as a strawman.
-
“The echo-chamber of morally driven fashionable nonsense coming out of the postmodernist social ‘sciences’ in general, & gender studies..."
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
What they choose to defend. Sometimes the papers argument. Sometimes the reputation of Gender Studies.
-
This goes back & forth from whether argument sound or argument so ridiculous, must be a bad journal.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.