This is so unscholarly and anti-intellectual: a bunch of dudes talking to other dudes about a topic they know almost nothing about. Lolz.
No, they didn't. This is just what it's easiest to refute. 1 test. 1 result.
-
-
Is that how scholarship works now? 'We have an N of 1. PUBLISH!!!!'
-
Is what how scholarship works? This is a twitter conversation.
-
@GodDoesnt's article certainly seemed to present itself as scholarship. It was certainly ABOUT scholarship. -
Hoax was aimed at scholarly publications. The denouement that it was satire was in Skeptic Magazine
-
By all means, think a different approach wld have been better & perhaps do it yourself.
-
The hoax was what it was & we can all talk about what it shows. Interesting how differently ppl read it.
-
This isn't a Rorschach test. There are standards of good scholarship, and this paper failed to meet them (a serious irony/hypocrisy.)
-
If you mean the hoax, I agree.That was the point. If u mean the piece in skeptic abt it, its appropriate
- 5 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Please see this 3 part tweet.https://twitter.com/HPluckrose/status/867136411752910848 …
-
The concern abt the state of scholarship in Gender Studies is much older & bigger.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.